What I know about Charles Denham
In 2010 I wrote a post entitled: “Praying with Chuck Denham.” Yesterday evening before bedtime I began receiving emails from
various leaders in the patient safety movement who read that post and knew of
my work with Chuck. They had
questions about a January 9, 2014 article by Jonathan Stempel in Reuters
stating:
“CareFusion Corp
agreed to pay $40.1 million to settle a federal government lawsuit accusing it
of paying kickbacks to boost sales of a pre-surgical skin treatment, and
marketing the product for unapproved uses.
The accord announced on
Thursday by the U.S. Department of Justice
resolves allegations that
CareFusion violated the federal False Claims Act by paying $11.6 million to a
doctor to promote its ChloraPrep product to healthcare providers.
That doctor, Charles
Denham, received the kickbacks while serving as co-chair of the safe practices
committee of the nonprofit National Quality Forum, which makes recommendations
on healthcare practices, the Justice Department said.
"Corrupting the
standard-setting process through kickbacks can affect the healthcare treatment
choices that doctors and hospitals may make for patients," Stuart Delery,
assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's civil division, said in
a statement.
The lawsuit also claimed
that CareFusion promoted ChloraPrep from September 2009 through August 2011 for
unapproved uses.
The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration had approved ChloraPrep to prepare patients' skin for surgery or
injections. CareFusion said on Thursday that it set aside funds for the
settlement in the first quarter of 2013.
Chief Executive Officer
Kieran Gallahue said the San Diego-based company is pleased to settle, and has
made "significant investments" to improve its quality and compliance
practices, including in sales and marketing.
Denham could not
immediately be reached for comment.”
I spoke to Chuck a few
minutes ago and he is working on a response statement based on the original
legal document. The document is quite
large so he will address each point carefully and with complete respect. That is all I can say right now about
the article in Reuters.
I can tell you what I know
about Charles Denham. He is a
tireless advocate for patient safety.
He hosts regular patient safety calls on Saturday mornings with patients
and has done so for years. He
films hour upon hour of patient safety video for his Discovery Channel
documentaries in the hope that those films will reach the general public and
alert them to the dangers of infection.
He drives his creative team team at TMIT (Texas Medical Institute of
Technology) ever forward to more and more campaigns that address patient
safety. He helped create
Speakerlink.org so patients would have some kind of platform to spread
awareness of the power of patient speakers.
I was honored to work with
the TMIT group as a paid fellow in 2011-2012. That helped me pay my rent, support my family and my advocacy
mission. In the years hence I have
participated in numerous unpaid webinars and conference calls in my support of
the valid patient safety work of Chuck and his team at TMIT.
In the fall of 2012, I
organized a conference called Partnership with Patients in Kansas City. It was a great meeting of patients and
partners from around the country focused on patient safety and data
access. I paid for that event
through crowdfunding and my own personal income.
So to all of my dear
patients friends and fellow advocates who attended that event and received
travel scholarships, were we taking ‘kickbacks’ from Carefusion for our noble
work? I ask everyone in the
patient safety movement to pause and consider Chuck’s stellar work within the
movement.
In the meantime, I will be
praying for Chuck Denham.
Denham has enriched himself unethically by taking advantage of a noble cause and well-meaning people. He's a snake oil (Chloraprep) salesman.
ReplyDeleteI don't know any details, but I've read the comments by leaders in patient safety: Dr. Peter Pronovost at Johns Hopkins, Dr. Bob Wachter at UCSF, and Dr. Lucian Leape at Harvard.
ReplyDeleteIt seems clear that Dr. Denham was involved in unethical practices, but it's also clear that he showed a tremendous amount of sincere kindness to many people. It is sad that his career has been tainted with this scandal. He had potential to be a driving force in patient safety.
I agree with you Regina. Praying for Dr. Denham is the best thing to do.